Against public objections, Solomons MPs give themselves bigger slush funds

Parliament in Honiara last month passed the Constituency Development Funds Bill, 2013, in the face of the strongest public opposition to a piece of legislation that observers can recall. The Bill will shortly become law, and the government proposes to discuss with a parliamentary committee the rules to be made under it.

The new law will formalise the management of Constituency Development Funds (CDFs) under the overall direction of MPs, supposedly to assist the social and economic development of their constituencies. Such funds have existed for many years as appropriations in the national budget, but less formally, without legal status and on a much smaller scale than is now planned.

Results across the country have been mixed, often difficult to trace or audit, and politically controversial at local and provincial levels. The government intends to greatly increase budget allocations to these funds, which must mean less money for other public services and developments. Once again Solomon Islands appears to be mimicking its big neighbour, PNG, where such funds now operate on a massive scale.

The Bill was introduced in a rush and strongly backed by the PM and Ministers, suggesting to some observers that it was the price of holding together the present government. Opposition to the new law was coordinated by Transparency Solomon Islands (TSI) with internet-based Anti-corruption Network Solomon Islands (ANSI) and Forum Solomon Islands International (FSII).  TSI organised a petition signed by 600 people and a public protest at Parliament House, while ANSI and FSII engaged several thousand objectors to the Bill through social media linkages and by joining the TSI petition and protest.

The CDF Act will give statutory endorsement to a system of publicly-funded political patronage, in which MPs try to entrench themselves in power by buying votes and rewarding supporters. While some supporters claim this is a monetised version of ‘big-man’ power in traditional Melanesia and chiefly rule elsewhere, it is widely seen as simply legalising greater misuse of public funds.

Tony Hughes is a Visiting Fellow at the Development Policy Centre. He lives in Solomon Islands, and works as an independent consultant. He was governor of the SI central bank 1982-93 and Pacific Regional Economic Adviser to ESCAP in 1994-99. He was the founding chairman of Transparency Solomon Islands in 2003, and is currently a Board member of TSI.

image_pdfDownload PDF

Tony Hughes

Tony Hughes is a freelance consultant in economic management. He lives in Solomon Islands and has worked in a number of Pacific island states. His current research concerns lessons from the experience of development practitioners who have been working in the Pacific in the last 20-30 years.


  • Is this what RAMSI is teaching? Is this the progress that courses in “governance” brings? What do the donors who funded this think of it?

    Unless a PR electoral system is introduced there is no prospect of the country being able to stand on its own feet. The unicameral majoritarian structure has failed everywhere it has been tried. In voting for these slush funds we have an illustration of why. Formalised corruption. A single chamber needs structural curbs.

    This has nothing to do with culture. The most upright individuals could be elected but with single-member electorates they will not survive unless they behave in this sort of fashion.

    My prediction has always been that the Solomons would collapse after RAMSI departed but here we see it failing while RAMSI is still there.

  • This is great news for the Members and their families. How many more houses will be bought in Australia with these funds? Thanks to the Development Policy Centre and Transparency Solomons for letting the world know. It is so sad to see the Government act in such a way.

Leave a Comment