Comments

Hello Natasha, I think your article with Prof Howes touches upon a bigger picture that runs deeper than seasonal employment opportunity. I refer to the Papua New Guinea Governor General, Sir Bob Dadae’s 49th independence address to the nation (https://www.postcourier.com.pg/gg-initiates-reality-check-for-nation/) in which he is reported by the Post Courier, to have said, “It is utterly disheartening to read in the dailies and see in the electronic media, almost every day, the total chaos, mayhem and madness in every province and communities of our country.” I cannot remember seeing such a direct and forthright statement to the ruling elite from such a prominent person before. His words by the norms of PNG protocol represents an earthquake. With a population of 11 or maybe 13 million people, I believe Papua New Guinea is where Australia’s focus should be. Building genuine trust and opening up civil society and nation building opportunities for PNG citizens in Australia and New Zealand has become critical. Sir Bob also said, “We need to transform our economy to create economic opportunities and empower our rural economies.” He is right. In relation to this I believe we need a quantum shift in focus from primarily institutional strengthening towards community economic empowerment and tailoring some of our markets to facilitate the undoubted opportunities that exist here. The notion that with more assistance PNG government mechanisms will deliver has proved at best to be a misnomer, for many a disaster and the many can tell you why. Given the cultural diversity (hyper regionalism) and the results of the first half century I believe there is a compelling argument to focus more support directly on civil society entities and local solutions. Enable them to participate in appropriate economic activity and service delivery. I fear that a failure to make a step change towards these goals will result in the further erosion of social cohesion, increase inequity and the fragility of the nation. I am convinced that with larger players now peddling alternative visions and wooing willing listeners the time to build greater trust and act on what the PNG population has been telling us, is now. Tai Nani
Go to comment
Cooking reduces or destroys mycotoxins in sago. Just like what happens to other foods when cooked. What the paper suggests is that people who depend on sago should improve its production, storage, and cooking to minimize or eliminate any mycotoxins. The Applied Technology Institute at the University of Technology in Lae and the MRI should take lead in this space.
Go to comment
Hi, my name is Wendy Jimmy and I'm interested in the program if it is possible for you to reach out to the villages in West Kerema, Gulf Province , specifically Bainuru, Kikori and Ihu districts.
Go to comment
As by means of 'democratic nation", PNG's national constitution provide provisions for equal participation and representation in all spheres of life either in political, economic, social, phycological etc. What matters is our adoption of 'Melanesian culture'. Culture is pinned to be most influential sector greatly impacting votes mindset on who they want to be in power. Man is the head; he has the right and potential to make decisions as most of us know. There is no law guaranteed for PNG to uplift 22 reserved seats. Our minds, and how we (voters) and candidates perform/ influence to earn public favor. This is what will earn us power. Everyone is guaranteed to run for election.
Go to comment
Proud to hear about establishing partnership arrangements with counterparts in PNG. I am an Health Administrative Officer of which I am keen and much interested about the opportunity for PNG Health Professionals. Please share more of your thoughts.
Go to comment
Hi Stephen, Thank you for suggestion. I agree with the mutual benefits you’ve highlighted. This is an idea that I’ve considered particularly under the PALM scheme short-term stream (up to 9 months) that would realise circular mobility. It would re-position PNG toward strategic skills transfer and capacity building of key twinning industry sectors generating “brain gain”. So when our people are “off season” from Australia, they return to PNG and re-integrate into the same industry/partner employer. such an offshore arrangement stipulated in an employment contract over a 4 year period provides incentive and achieves retention if there is employer-buy in. Ultimately achieving circular mobility and wins for all stakeholders. For now in PALM, PNG and other participating countries only supply the workforce to Australia where they determine workforce gaps exist in identified sectors. Currently, in the health field only age care is offered under the PALM-long term, and it has its own pro’s and con’s. Nonetheless, our shared ideas are worth exploring further. Tenkiu tumas.
Go to comment
Dames father Jim Taylor first came to Hagen and he was welcomed by my grandfather Yamka Kaura. Jim camped at Kelua for 6 months after moving to a new location were Hagen Town now located. Hope to meet with Meg anytime soon to discuss important things to put up a monument for Jim Taylor and Yamka Kaura at Kelua.
Go to comment
Hello Natasha, I do like this idea and the two littlies looking out over the tarmac at Jacksons. Reminds me of my own children doing the same thing at that age. I would like to throw an idea into the ring. I know a few PNG health professionals with international qualifications to boot who work in PNG for the smell of an oily rag while those ostensibly doing a similar job in Australia earn a king’s ransom by comparison. With no desire to start a “brain drain” I propose the following. Subject to passing an accreditation exam, PNG health professionals (including nursing officers and midwives) be offered a six month on, six months off visa to work in the same or similar sectors in Australia (and New Zealand). Of necessity it would have to start small so as not to exacerbate the huge shortfall in qualified staff in PNG. But over time become the modus operandi for many. This would enable them to earn significant income every year while still contributing directly to the needs at home. The potential benefits as I see it are many and flow both ways. Apart from a boost in the personal income it could expose participants to levels of service delivery, particularly in the primary healthcare sector that many I believe would strongly advocate for upon their return home. It would be expected to significantly stimulate the uptake of health sciences training in PNG where at present a very large shortfall in training capacity and health professionals exist. If it was an ongoing arrangement, I envisage Australian teaching institutions establishing satellite or partnership arrangements with counterparts in PNG, an arrangement that would benefit all parties, particularly in primary healthcare services where the greatest needs exist. In total the benefits to both countries would be significant. I would suggest that Solomon Island and Vanuatu health professionals might also wish to participate in such a scheme which ultimately would include other sectors. Not unlike part of the vision that underpinned the creation of the European Union, I foresee our nearest neighbours benefitting in tangible ways on their own terms while we for our part would benefit greatly in many ways from becoming more neighbourly.
Go to comment
Thanks Natasha. I just pointed out the potential (and claims) for corruption and bribery during corruption during votes of no confidence. But I wouldn’t say therefore there shouldn’t be votes of no confidence. Because if the trajectory the country is in is not stopped through a VONC, it would get worse. CDFs should’ve been abolished a long time ago. But lingers on because, among other things, it helps the PM buy support. We’ve called for either it to be abolished, or at least legislated for that it removes government’s control over it. But again, the government wouldn’t want to lose control of the funding because it would lose the ability to control MPs’ behaviour.
Go to comment
very nice article 🥰👍 ,as a Papua New Guinean I got the points 1:bribery during vonc and also general election?? in my opinion it's part of selling your birthright. In the Bible story of essau and Jacob. 2: VONC ! why not we change it to debate like USA presidential elections. However I think the ministry holders and the prime minister as to undertake a course on how to run the country, province, district and how to do their ministerial jobs. For example,a teacher by profession holds health ministerial portfolio how can he/she knows what the health department needs and understand faster to issue funds. if needed ASAP .sometimes the request is critical but it as to go under review and could take another two weeks or more because he has no idea on what is being requested. PNG is and will be going back wards because of politics is being driven into economic downfall of our country.
Go to comment