Comments

Having been an advocate for refugees on Manus Island for six years, I read 'No Friend but the Mountains' with great interest. I wanted to know the Islanders story too and fortunately became friends with one who lives now in Port Moresby. Yet I also felt as if I was reading a Dostoevsky novel and loved the atmosphere Boochani trapped me in as I read non stop until finished! This critique by a Manus Islander is most interesting and I thank its writer for giving me yet another angle on this tragic historical situation.

An excellent program which again reinforces the important role that remittances play in developing economies. Clearly mobile payment platforms aligned to remittances are a contributing driving technology.

Picked out some good points. Thank you so much.

Hello Dr. Nemat, There is no touch in Pakistan's role on post US-Taliban settlement in Afghanistan. I hope if your next article is something about what could be the likelihood reasons or influencing factors to make the process the fail.

Good article - old timers will know this works by simply looking at history. The number of former leaders who all came from the same schools which we all know in the Pacific. However, there were some design failures back then (capture by political elites) which will need to be avoided. A good case study would be the old Aotearoa Scholarships that were abruptly halted by the NZ Government about 15 years ago I think. They lost a lot of traction after that, which was slightly recovered by the Seasonal Worker Programme. In todays geopolitical environment where some Asian countries are seen as more trustworthy such interventions have to be part of the long-term solution to the problem of addressing the relationship between Australia and the Pacific. Alas like all long-term interventions in Education the results will not be known for decades.

I totally agree in all regarding domestic violence, but the message needs to be expressed boldly for everyone “SILENCE =VIOLENCE” that’s my slogan towards violence in any form!

Thank you Drs Statish and Edwards for bringing up this on the social media platform. As alluded by Michael with the Martyrs experience, this is not a new arrangement for Papua New Guinea with Australia. The Secondary Scholarships existed before in the 1990s and ceased in the late 1990s simply because taking PNG's best students away from Grade 10 only to return to PNG after 3 years. PNG's universities were not able to accept them because of the wrong subjects combination and most of the students did not get good grades to qualify for them to enter the universities back home, although, only a handful of them did find their way in. Teachers exchange program will benefit most of our teachers in the secondary and national high schools in terms of enriching their knowledge and will learn and re-learn new innovations into teaching. Most parents of best performing students will not allow their child to be taken away to study matriculation abroad and return home. We have to go beyond matriculation and allow them to sit for the Australian Examinations and enter into Australian universities to complete the scholarships. This will require a 6 to 7 year scholarship for one child. The costs will be very high but this is the way forward. This concept is not new for PNG. It was there before. We have to look into better ways to select our best students and educate them in Australia. I don't see sustainability of taking the best performing students in PNG to Australia and sending them home after 3 years or 2 years. Thank you.

The latest update I have for 2000 emissions is from “Table 8: National inventory total from 2000 to 2019, by financial year” in the September 2019 NGGI quarterly update published February 2020. This table reports 2000 emissions at 536.2 million tonnes. 95% of this is 509.4 million tonnes. But the “Figure 28: Australia’s cumulative emissions reduction task to 2020” of Australia’s emissions projections 2019 (published December 2019) reports the 2020 target at 513 million tonnes. Considering the September 2019 NGGI is the most recent publication, I will go with this one. The 2020 financial year ends in June 2020. September 2019 was the first quarter of this financial year. Data Table 1A: Actual emissions (Mt), by sector, by quarter, since 2001-02 of the September NGGI reports the September 2019 quarter total emissions at 133.3 million tonnes. So 509-133=376 million tonnes for the remaining 3 quarters, or an average of 125 million tonnes each quarter. Considering the average of the last 3 quarters in the 2019 financial year was 132 million tonnes, and the Australia’s emissions projections 2019 was 534 million tonnes for the 2020 year, I think it is very improbable that we will meet and beat the 2020 target of 95% of 2000.

Tamoi, I think you may have misinterpreted my comments. I was not proposing any kind of 'objective assessment'. In fact, I am a language teacher, teacher-trainer and trainer-trainer working in Kiribati and Vanuatu. I work within a very different paradigm from the economics paradigm which informs the proposed study by Drs Chand and Edwards. I don't think random sampling is appropriate here because no two schools are equivalent and the differences are especially pronounced when we are comparing, for example, central and outer islands or urban and rural schools in Pacific Island states. In my opinion, there are also very significant issues with the validity of the summative testing tools which are currently in use in the Pacific and with how we can measure the broad range of impacts which effective teaching can have, not only on skills and knowledge but on attitudes. Yes, we are dealing with human beings and that is why I would use quantitative analysis very carefully indeed and combine it with some in-depth and nuanced qualitative investigation into the effects and impacts of any program. I think these programs and their evaluations need to be designed by a range of experts collaboratively, including educators.

That, if we are to assume that all schools across Australia fall under one category, to apply the qualitative and quantitative method you are proposing to achieve a proposed objective assessment Angela. It should not be the primary issue. We are dealing with human beings here. You can not achieve a 100 percent outcome if that plus higher academic is to define social policy between neighboring islands. This is the 21st century, thought we’d buried the white policy. An institutionalized tool applied to restrict shared learning across the board to both recipients. Unfortunately we will never bridge the gap nor give a fair go to all.

Design of the evaluation program is critical for an objective assessment - and yes, it will require careful thought. This isn’t the place to spell out the details of the evaluation method, but three necessary conditions for the above would include: (i) integration of the goals of the program at a higher level (e.g. deepened educational links with Australia through education of children funded with Australian aid); (ii) benchmarks created on measures of success for on-going monitoring before the rollout of the policy interventions; and, (iii) random assignment of treatment and control schools. Happy to invest in the design of such a program as ‘proof of concept’ if there is willingness for a trial.

Thanks for the reply, Satish. I wonder how you would measure and compare the impacts of the two programs given their very different designs and purposes. PSSSP would be likely to have a very strong impact on participating student learning outcomes and should also build ongoing relationships, the impacts of which are hard to measure in the short term, but would not affect teacher quality, whereas (trainee) teacher exchange and/or in-service teacher mentoring - if done well - should affect teacher quality and may also improve aspects of school management and institutional culture, but it may be hard to measure direct and immediate impacts on student learning outcomes, especially given the complexity of school contexts and all of the variables involved, and given issues around the validity of testing tools. I think some nuanced qualitative research combined with a quantitative analysis would be valuable.