Data released by the Department of Employment indicate that it has been another year of rapid growth for the Seasonal Worker Programme (SWP). Growth was down from the 50% of 2015-16, but still high at 37%.
Seasonal Worker Programme visa numbers
Rapid SWP growth may be a result of a fall in backpacker numbers, moves by state governments and supermarkets to more tightly regulate horticultural labour (which favour use of more regulated schemes like the SWP), and good feedback from those farmers using the scheme. On the supply side, there is no shortage of Pacific islanders wanting to participate in the scheme, with potential participants vastly outstripping the number of jobs made available by employers.
As well as growing in size, the SWP is becoming more diverse. In 2012-13, 81% of workers were from Tonga. That figure is now down to 44%. More than half the growth in the number of workers in 2016-17 was due to Vanuatu, whose share is now 35%. Timor Leste and Samoa are in third and fourth place respectively, and together the top four countries send more than 90% of all SWP workers. Some of the miscellaneous “other” countries did have a good year (PNG grew from 42 to 139, Kiribati from 20 to 124), but off a very low base.
Seasonal Worker Programme country composition
The percentage of return workers was steady at about two-thirds of the previous year’s number of workers, indicating both the preference of employers for returning workers, and the desire of most workers to return.
Seasonal Worker Programme percentage of return workers
Note: Percentage is of workers coming in the previous year.
The share of female workers has remained stable over the last five years at just under 15%. PNG and Timor Leste currently do the best for gender equity (just under 30%), Samoa and Solomon Islands the worst (3% and zero, respectively). No countries show a sustained improvement in gender equity over time. The small improvement in gender equity since 2013-14 is due to a switch away from Tonga (low equity) to Timor and Vanuatu (higher equity). In 2016-17, Vanuatu managed to send nearly 100 more women workers than Tonga despite having 540 workers fewer in total.
Percentage of female workers by sending country and for all
While or perhaps because it continues to grow, the SWP continues to attract bad publicity. Late last year, the Weekly Times ran a story on the fact that 12 SWP workers have died while in Australia since 2012. While the Government clarified that none had died on the job (five were in two car accidents), the article implied that at least some of the deaths were due to poor living conditions. All of these deaths are a tragedy. Clearly more needs to be done to ensure that only healthy workers are sent to Australia, and, regardless of the causes of these deaths, to clean up the horticultural sector. But the SWP is part of the answer, not the problem. The major research report on the SWP in 2017 was the University of Adelaide’s Sustainable solutions: the future of labour supply in the Australian vegetable industry. One of its major findings was that the “The SWP results in less exploitation of workers … when compared with other low-skilled visa pathways”, especially backpackers (emphasis added).
Also completed in 2017, and to be released in early 2018, is a new World Bank study Maximizing the development impacts from temporary migration: recommendations for Australia’s SWP. The Bank interviewed some 400 Pacific seasonal workers in Australia, and asked them how satisfied they were with their experience. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is ‘not at all satisfied’ and 10 is ‘extremely satisfied’, the average was 8.6. For Tonga, the largest sending country, the average was 9.9.
Despite its rapid growth in recent years, SWP expansion should have a long way to run. It is still much smaller than New Zealand’s Recognised Seasonal Employer Scheme (which is now capped at 10,500 workers per year), and much smaller than the number of backpackers working on Australian farms (approximately 40,000). In the Devpolicy-World Bank 2016 Pacific Possible report on labour mobility, we projected that with reforms, the uncapped SWP could reach 40,000 by 2040. That would be achieved with two decades of the absolute increase seen this year. The SWP is still being held back by red tape, but this year’s encouraging results and the farmer-friendly SWP reforms just announced suggest that our optimistic long-term projections may not have been totally unrealistic.
Note: Graphs and data available here.
I need to add, a very big THANK YOU Professor Stephen Howes and Sachini Muller for all the work that you do to help advance and address key policy issues re: the SWP. This scheme is impacting rural lives in Vanuatu in more ways than one, at least for the guys that we have sent to Australia since 2015.
Hi Stephen,
Been following all your posts on the blog and have browsed through your previous research reports. My partner is an agent here in Vanuatu, and she’s sending four ladies to Australia next month, which we’re very pleased about.
BTW, I was in your ‘Governments, Markets and Global Change’ course at Crawford in 2011.
Thank you Stephen and Sachini. Really informative summary of the status quo. Helpful to see where and who needs further assistance. Gender balance an ongoing issue but much more in the spotlight now which is good. Yes you’re right that after many years of trial there is now significant broad based experience for growers to be far more confident in taking that leap of faith.
HI John, Thanks a lot for your comment. We’d love to hear more about your experience at Childers. Regards, Stephen
Hi Stephen,
It took a person with adventurous heart to travel and work and in the process I worked in Childers, Brisbane and Sydney and travel by road from Cairns to Rockhampton and travelled on tilt Train to Brisbane from Rockhampton to Brisbane. From Brisbane I got on the coach to the Boarder of new South Wales and Queensland (forgot name of place).
Arrived in Sydney city centre and rested at one of the Backpackers at Suari Hills and got another holiday worked and stayed there for about three (3) weeks and returned to Rockhampton, where I was study at Central Queensland University in 1999-2000.
I was on AusAid Scholarship so I saved all my stipend and really enjoyed my study and stay in Australia, especially living in Australian Towns like Childers.
I also had good money travelling back home.
regards
and I am pleased (and relieved) to announce that the Solomons female participation in the SWP has risen this financial year with Gracekate Farms employing 2 female workers in the group!! Thankyou for the article, we and our seasonal workers found it a very informative read. cheers Kerry
An excellent and informative write up.
Stephen and Sachini,
Thank you for the discussions on SWP. Firstly, this I think is a government to government program but what is the purpose for the SWP?
If there was a reason for the SWP, the monitoring and evaluation of the program will confirm whether the objective of the program has been achieved and areas for improvement will be identified.
I guess this is important Program for building good relationship between pacific island countries and Australia.
One way to help Papua New Guinea instead of providing government with Aid funding, it would be good to provide employment for Papua New Guineans through the SWP and reduce Australian Aid to PNG Government.
I have done fruit picking worked at Childers, Queensland and benefits are great and inter alia, this is real people to people relationship building and can help countries grown strong.