With the aim of restoring confidence and discipline in the constabulary, PNG Prime Minister James Marape recently proposed recruiting around 20 foreign officers to take up leadership positions in the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary (RPNGC). Some of these would work at police HQ in Port Moresby, while some would be provincial police commanders.
The PM also announced the establishment of a new special police unit, to be called the Anti-Terrorism and Domestic Force, to address “terrorist-like” incidents such as kidnapping. The unit will be “unnamed”, “invested with lethal force” and, seemingly, not subject to normal rules. Penalties will also be increased for initiating tribal fights.
These measures were announced as alarm grows about violent crime and localised conflicts in parts of the Highlands, including kidnapping by criminal gangs and ongoing armed conflicts, entailing sophisticated firepower, mercenaries and military-style tactics. These have resulted in multiple fatalities, widespread rapes, destruction of property and gardens, and population displacement. Enga Province has experienced the worst violence, with up to 150 people killed in August according to provincial police commander George Kakas. There is no doubt there is a significant, and seemingly escalating, problem of conflict and violence in the country.
But are the solutions proposed by the PM likely to help or to exacerbate the problem?
While continuing to be framed as “law and order” problems demanding muscular policing and law enforcement solutions, the fighting is occurring in what are active conflict zones. In many parts, messy local wars are being waged by gunmen armed with high-powered weapons operating within shifting coalitions of groups and alliances. Is it realistic or appropriate to expect police – trained to manage crime – to respond to socially complex small-scale warfare?
There is scant evidence that tough “law and order” approaches involving special policing operations can, on their own, stop the kinds of conflicts being experienced in the Highlands today. On the contrary, violent responses by ill-disciplined mobile squads can have counter-productive outcomes, prolonging or escalating conflict rather than ending it.
In considering the call for foreign police, it is also helpful to reflect on the history of this kind of engagement. Australia has been providing capacity building to the RPNGC since the late 1980s. With a strong focus on training, this assistance is currently provided by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) under the PNG-Australia Policing Partnership.
A more robust form of policing assistance occurred under the short-lived Enhanced Cooperation Program (ECP) in 2004, where uniformed Australian police officers were sworn in as members of the RPNGC to work alongside their local counterparts. Although signed off by the PNG government and popular among the broader community, the ECP offended nationalist sentiments among elements of the political elite as well as resentment among some in the RPNGC. Luther Wenge, then governor of Morobe and a former national court judge, mounted a successful constitutional challenge. Australian police had to be withdrawn after PNG’s Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the legal immunities they had been granted were unconstitutional. Since then, the AFP have worked as advisers to the RPNGC rather than in an executive policing capacity.
Periodic calls have been made for a return of uniformed Australian police, particularly in light of the deteriorating situation in the Highlands. However, without the immunities they demand to participate in international policing missions, the AFP are unlikely to agree. Likewise, it seems unlikely that PNG’s political leaders will agree to amend the country’s constitution to allow for another ECP-type policing intervention.
The current proposal to appoint foreign personnel to serve as senior officers within the RPNGC is an attempt to circumvent these constitutional and political difficulties. However, there is no guarantee that such appointments will not generate the same kind of resentments as the earlier ECP. There is also the question of who will pay for these foreign officers. With the RPNGC facing endemic fiscal constraints, expending scarce government resources on foreign personnel is unlikely to go down well.
Employing 20 foreign officers is also unlikely to address one of the major challenges for the RPNGC, namely their small size and thin presence in many rural areas. Speaking earlier this year, Internal Security Minister Peter Tsiamalili Jnr said there were only around 5,600 uniformed officers in PNG, which translates into a police to population ratio of around 1:1,854. This is well below that of comparable Pacific Island countries (Solomon Islands 1:500 and Fiji 1:550).
Arguably a more helpful way of spending a policing budget would be to increase the numbers of police on the ground. Supporting them to work in productive, reliable and mutually supporting relationships with local communities is also a good idea. As discussed previously, reactive policing is expensive and extremely difficult, given the divergences in scale of manpower and weaponry between police and the armed groups.
However, there is a large preventive role to be played by police carrying out their normal policing duties in a reliable manner. We know that many intergroup conflicts are sparked by individual transgressions that go un-responded to by the state – a drunken brawl, or an act of sexual violence. Quick responsiveness to such incidents may put out small fires before they have a chance to gather heat.
In addition, development of relational networks and coalitions by police and civil society can supplement the manpower and local knowledge needed to manoeuvre in volatile contexts. While foreign senior police might have some advantages in terms of technical skills and immunity from RPNGC factionalism and politics, they would find it much harder to navigate the social complexities on the ground where local knowledge is critical to effective policing interventions.
Overall, performative and simple solutions are unlikely to be helpful in resolving complex problems such as intergroup fighting. A holistic response addressing some of the underlying drivers and the patterns of violence is more likely to make headway. The police undoubtedly have a role to play, but it is more likely to be found in modelling local, respectful, reliable adherence to the rule of law, than in importing foreign officers and resorting to unaccountable heavily armed squads.
Wonder if being an exceptional country in terms of having one of the greatest proportions of the population trapped in rural enclaves at one of the lowest standards of living on the planet has anything to do with policing conditions in PNG?
Hi”
I think that one of the most important factors that governs individual morality in PNG context is our traditional ethical value. The methods used nowadays in the policing system is not really helping rather provoking more troubles and conflicts. Ask a simple citizen in PNG and he/she will tell you that “I HATE THE POLICE”. Instead of seeking help and safety from the police they hating them not because they are bad but the hatred is built upon fear.
Moreover, the traditional ethical value that governs our society in the past was more effective than today’s legalistic system that provide law and order to the society. People new back than that if they fail to comply with the law of the society they will be neglected from the community.
Why are people turning their vengeance against the policing system, is it helping the people, what are the contributing factors that creates a negative impression between the community and police? These are some questions that we can think about.
I think that if the policing system be integrated with some of our traditional ethical values that governed our society in the past could be a way forward towards formulating a contextual policing method to curve down the ongoing problems in our society.
Papua New Guineans respond well towards what they believe in and there are possibilities to make it happen using a new contextual policing system..
By doing so we won’t need foreign police officers in PNG, we can manage our own ethical principles by comprehending to what we believe in.
Thanks Miranda and Sinclair! Also interested to hear your thoughts on to what extent the more explicit promotion of a mixed-model/hybrid approach might be suitable, where ‘community policing’ type groups (that in many cases already exist) collaborate with the police to extend their reach into communities. Helpful/viable or adding layers of complication?
I, John Kombuk from Jiwaka and President of Papua New Guinea Rural Development Inc Association would really thank you for vital information update addressing the issuing of the PNG government’s fail policies.
As The NGO (PNGRDI) taking holistic approach for untouching neglected remoteset people of PNG. They were missed out alot from PNG Government in basic goods and services since independence in 1975. Resulted with the boom of highly population, mostly dominate by youths involving with social violence and practice in their respective societies as per. It’s become ongoing problems and issues arising in the societies and communities at large. PNG Rural development Inc Association is the source of information provider to your attention for partnership and request to step into these areas for more physical information will assess by yourself is what the concern.
“A holistic response addressing some of the underlying drivers and the patterns of violence is more likely to make headway”. So true and I think best handled by local expertise.
Population pressure on arable land, lack of opportunity for school leavers, inability to earn money by legal means, widening inequality, poor health, education and infrastructure services in addition to the constabulary being “small in size and thin in numbers.
In my opinion the opportunity to focus upon and invest in human capital development was been missed from the late 1980s and in a youthful population the situation continues to worsen.
Petty crime that escalates into serious violence is more often than not driven by an overwhelming sense of frustration among youth (particularly young men) who believe they have been overlooked and short changed by the development process. And I believe they are right.
Without income for bride price they find it hard to get married, earn respect, acquire land, repay extended families and honour forebears? Fighting offers one solution and an outlet for pent up frustration.
Extra policing from any source will not solve these issues alone – it is not even a band aid solution. Better health, education, infrastructure and economic opportunity are part of the mix.
These issues are regional and cannot be satisfactorily tackled from Port Moresby. Nobody living in an Engan “haus lain” gives two hoots about decisions made in Waigani. Solutions can be found locally to address local needs.
One pathway is greater access to Australian and NZ fresh and value added food markets. That is needed now. Something with real economic heft at the population base: centred on provincial receiving and processing centres that inspect, grade and truck finished product to regional ports for shipment to Australia, NZ, Asia.
(If USA/Aust are apparently committed to re-establishing a naval presence at Gamadoudou in Milne Bay province after 80 years, then why not a primary produce export hub as well?)
PNG is unlikely to achieve any of this on its own. I am of the view that the stability of a demonstrably fragile state of ten or maybe fifteen million people is precariously poised to go the way of Haiti at least regionally, if we, the big Kahuna on the block do not get our act together.
Thanks Stephen & totally agreed. Time to move beyond symptoms to addressing some of the underlying causes.