Comments

From Joe Ben on Australia’s risk in PNG: why the Pukpuk Treaty could backfire
Is there an urgent need for both Governments to sign a Treaty. With regard to our Defence Force the GoPNG's international obligation to another country is only for active service, if that county is at war. "Active Service" is defined as service in the field against an enemy, combat activities. Does the GoPNG have an international obligation to deploy our Defence Force troops for active service in Australia? Clearly not, my layman opinion is that this Treaty does not comply with section 202 (b) and section 205 of our Constitution. We the ordinary citizens of PNG require the intervention of the Supreme Court to interpret this Treaty and determine whether this Treaty is unconstitutional or not. Our Government must not deceive its citizens to believe that this Treaty will create employment opportunity for PNG citizens into the Australian Defence Force. The relevant authority to make the Supreme Court application owe it to the ordinary PNG citizens to make a court application, PNG is a democratic county, we have three arms of Government, we must not allow our Government Ministers to patronise us, by doing anything and everything which is not in our national interest, and does not comply with our Constitution. We are a pacific nation, peace loving people, our government's policy for the last 50 years has always been friends to all and enemies to none.
From Paul PETRUS on Slow peacebuilding to prevent the outbreak of fighting following peace
I agree with the alternatives suggested in this article. Just to highlight on the last point on mercenaries here. It is a lucrative income generating activity for someone who bets his life to serve the interest of others. Many of the actual fights currently are orchestrated or implemented by this hire group. It will be a very effective measure if hire men or mercenaries are targeted to lay down arms with other lucrative opportunities. And it is not a job young men would like to engage but because of the economic situations they engage in such activities. Generally tribal conflicts will only deescalate when many indigenous peacebuilding activities or alternatives are initiated at the local level by the local leaders within the tribal communities.
From Kristi Mahrt on Raising PNG’s minimum wage to improve affordability of healthy diets
Thank you for your interest! You can learn more in our research note on this topic which you can find here. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/175410
From Stephen Charteris on Australia’s risk in PNG: why the Pukpuk Treaty could backfire
Pukpuk indeed. Was the choice of name deliberately prescient? And Michael Main has spotted the bull elephant in the room.
From Wiliges Jack on Australia’s risk in PNG: why the Pukpuk Treaty could backfire
This Pukpuk Treaty is being decided by those persons favorable towards Australia. Despite our best efforts in negotiating this Treaty The "Yes Master" mentality of the colonial era doesn’t seem to leave us yet. What we fail to see as intellectuals is that if this Treaty goes through, it will just be another Boomerang that is swung to us and will float back to the thrower. Everything we anticipate to benefit from will be just 10% PNG and 90% Australia. It will not only bind the military but also the economy making PNG vulnerable to Australia's whims and controls. PNG economy is gaining slowly and our leaders need to be careful. Where is the look North Policy, Friends to all and Enemies to None to name a few policies. Australia is going to put us at a disadvantage by locking us in and eventually use this Treaty as a tool to prevent other countries like China and its friends to trade with us rendering PNG Economy to Australias control. Why does PNG not start thinking on its own and try doing something smart?
From Jeff on Australia’s risk in PNG: why the Pukpuk Treaty could backfire
If you understand PNG Tok PISIN, PukPuk means crocodile; interestingly, the Treaty was called that.
From Michael Main on Australia’s risk in PNG: why the Pukpuk Treaty could backfire
This is a terrific article Michael. If Australia wants such close integration with PNGDF then surely its first priority must be to concentrate on PNG's internal security requirements. If Australia wants a reliable security partner in our region then it must be based on the social stability and prosperity of the PNG state and its people. To our peril we consistently overlook just how serious this situation has become.
From Paul Maima on BPNG changes tack, but will it follow through?
Thanks Professor well explained. The depreciation of PNG Currency has affected ordinary Papua New Guineas. It needs to be improved.
Subscribe to our newsletter