Comments

I am appalled by the fact that there are many PNG women who also support that view “yu no man, yu meri" (even some educated and civilised). I have witnessed alot myself and when I tried to correct them I was ridiculed. In a gender biased society we may think that our own women would stand together and support the worthy cause of breaking the cycle but that is not the case. Also on that note I give credit to a few good men who know a woman's worth and support their leadership. Coming from the Highlands it is even worse. We are silenced and told off in public gatherings that we are women and it is not in our place to stand up and talk. Only when we bring in money and material things then the podium is granted and praises are in order (I am already feeling really disgusted just writing this). It is such a shame there are many women leaders who have the potential to bring about alot of positive changes but are discouraged by the fact that even though they put their hands up to represent the minority the support is never there. In future we would like to see many women in parliament. But how long will it take before we reach that point? I do not know. What I know now is that the mentality still exists and is quite strong.

Thanks Stephen The name "ANGAU" is particularly poignant in the context of Australia/PNG relations, both prior to 1975 and currently. Excuse me while I provide further background, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANGAU_General_Hospital. STARTS: ANGAU stands for the Australian New Guinea Administrative Unit, which was an Australian Army unit that was formed on 21 March 1942 during World War II and was responsible for the civil administration of the Territory of Papua and the Mandated Territory of New Guinea. Following Japan's entry in the war, the civil administration of both Papua and the Mandated Territory of New Guinea was taken over by an Australian Army military government and came under the control of ANGAU from February 1942 until the end of World War II CURRENTLY: In September 2013, it was reported that the hospital had deteriorated over the last 20 years and that its buildings had become infested with termites. The renovation of the hospital is a core condition of the asylum-seeker deal between Australia and PNG made on July 19, 2013. ANGAU has only 12 of the 32 specialists it needs, and just 55 per cent of its 729 total staff.[7] In February 2014, the Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Julie Bishop, stated: "The Australian Government has committed to redevelop the ANGAU Hospital. The original hospital is now 50 years old. It was built in 1964 and is run down, it has been attacked by termites over time, there is asbestos in the building, so we need to work very hard to lift the standards to something that is world class."[8] Over K300 million has been invested in the redevelopment of Angau, including the master plan and 50 percent of the capital cost of renovation works. It will take two years to plan and design the new Angau hospital, while the major construction work will commence in 2016–17. ENDS So - is the PNG Government cutting back because Australia is picking up the slack ?

Educated and informed voters is an important point John and this is definitely a challenge for PNG. But i think PNG voters are more educated than they were in the previous elections about, not only the inefficiency of the government but also on the electoral processes and the importance of their votes. But we'll have to wait and see whether that will translate to some form of political change alluded to in the article. Bal

Hi Bri, a good observation. Although arguable whether the right to vote was legitimately exercised, people were given the opportunity to vote nevertheless. The concern in the article is not so much that issue, but a likelihood for change in PNG political leadership. Bal

Unless Bono starts playing music:(

I really liked your article.

Thanks Bal Your discussions around “expect the unexpected” in the election turnout in recent US presidential election and would expect the same for upcoming PNG election holds some expectations for the land of expect the unexpected-PNG politics. In the recent US election, one truth that even Americans failed to understand is this; many Americans rejected the status quo under Democrats. That led to Republican winning the President seat, majority seats in Senate and House of Representatives, a complete whitewash. American across the states demonstrated what they are not happy with and what they want going forward. Back to PNG political scene, we have seen and gone through the turbulence of PNC and coalition run government including those broad day light high level corruption cases against Prime Minister, cabinet Ministers and top bureaucrats of departments, unprecedented high record of foreign loans, low cash flow while PNG deliver one of its biggest project-LNG Project. One notable development across the institutions and agencies is that everyone in position of authority seems to serve only one Master. These will go on records in 2017 election outcome as we assumed. The difference we may find is that; in American there is educated voters base than PNG, though some public awareness done by activists and students around the country, the possibility of cash exchange during election unlike America is very much inevitable. Also foul play during polling and counting period is another area of concern that would skewed outcome of election results-expect the unexpected. Otherwise, educated elites in PNG have known and seen the governance situation in PNG by the current PNC and coalition led government, it’s not a secret.

What happened in the US elections is certainly not people power or democracy at work...... If it was truely people power and democracy then we would all be preparing for a CLINTON presidency... The truth is that Americans do not have the constitutional right to vote for a president....... That responsibility lies with the electoral college.....A kill switch installed by the American founding fathers to ensure the peasants did not select the President. .... In PNG just as it is in America all the politicians are members of one party.....The "Property" party (vidal)

Thanks YbK. God is no respector of persons. Even my view shall not change one iota of God's divine power and will. We need to be found listening to the will of God and his prevailing wisdom. Can not speak of Trump neither Brexit. Both situations are unique in their own merit. The trends are not familiar and comparable enough to suggest that people power will speak again. I would rather say nothing than worry about the chicken before it hatches. Enough writings on the wall. Even if I wait....my anticipation is on God to lead me daily. Your views, YbK, are responsible and respected.

Thanks Stephen Your discussions around MP funds is interesting to the fact that it increases over the last few years. Maybe you referred to other MP funds as well but the most popular top-up is DSIP funds currently stands at PGK15 million per year, in a 5-year term of Parliament, its equivalent to PGK75 million. This is a lot of money for an electorate and everyone has to fight tooth and nail to get into power and control it. This DSIP fund is legally pegged against all social development aspects (education, health, agriculture etc) in district, which the MP and his/her committee now called the DDA will have to formulate budget for it. A small portion from this funding (DSIP) is regarded as discretionary funds for MP. That is the allocation which MP can decide where and how to use, but not to personal use. So concern raised by many is on the use of this PGK15 million in the district and nothing tangible is on ground to show. Also the mechanism in place to monitor expense of this public funding is weak and subject to manipulation. However, few of those subject to honest monitoring and audit resulted in some MP being prosecuted before the laws for miss appropriation and thieve. At the same time this current government introduces “free education and health care services” and poured money directly into district, but this should not give MP or DDA the leeway to cease funding allocation to education and health in the district with DSIP funding. The reality now is that, MP is the CEO of DDA and appoint his/her cronies to DDA board, influence DDA to entertain paper proposals along cronies and tribal loyalists. They walk away with fatty cheques while some put huge claims for little cost or value of job done. To paint the situation in the district look better, most MP bought vehicles and presented to schools, health centres and ward counsellors as gifts with slogan like “donation by MP…..”. People see and thought this MP is performing well, but if you go down to the school with the new vehicle donated by MP, the classrooms are run down, no desk for students and even no teacher house, the same goes to health centre with the new donated vehicle. To change this model of MP funds is up the legislators themselves or need an honest prime minister to propose a review to this MP funds. Otherwise they knowingly create this system to appease their hunger for wealth and power.

Nice article . How about accountability ?

Hello again Mitiana. The comment posted by Gerard Ng made me realise that there’s more I could mention to you that might be useful. For instance, are you aware that phone interviews were undertaken regarding food security during the recent drought in Papua New Guinea? Information on the phone interview technique can be found <a href="http://mvam.org/2016/03/04/getting-food-security-data-from-rugged-and-remote-areas-of-papua-new-guinea/" rel="nofollow">here</a> and my earlier, speculative comments regarding the potential for phones to assist with the drought response are available <a href="https://www.lowyinterpreter.org/the-interpreter/ringing-change-how-mobile-phones-could-aid-drought-response-png" rel="nofollow">here</a>. You may also be interested in a systematic body of work being funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) to look into the use of tablets and smartphones in data collection. They started with a desktop review of 17 software options, narrowed down to two that seemed suitable and then tested the two of them in the field. They are now beginning to trial the software option that performed best in agriculture projects in several countries, including Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea, as well as some in Asia. A film on this work is available <a href="https://vimeo.com/175285740" rel="nofollow">here</a> and more information is available <a href="http://agimpact.org/resources/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Amanda. 🙂