Comments

Nothing I will talk about but only a question..my question is - why government intention to keep borrowing more money to fund APEC in Papua New Guinea in 2018?

Companies like Viterra are employing back Packers over young locals, or if they employ young locals they give the backpackers longer hours, even though the locals want hours too. These are usually European backpackers,and include jobs like weigh bridge operator, that you should not need to get overseas workers for, and should not send a local home after 4 hours and let a backpacker continue the shift. There should be a specified ratio of backpackers to Australians in some of these jobs.

Thanks Shane.

Thanks for the comment. Just want to clarify we weren’t trying to make a causal link. Regards, Stephen.

Well said

I do not want to appear pessimistic but PNG's biggest issue is still endemic and systematic corruption at the political and bureaucratic level. We are one of the most corrupt countries in the world, our public service is essentially dysfunctional or dead. To me, those that coin such phrases as "PNG becoming the richest black nation in the world" have an agenda to distract the general population from rising up against corrupt politicians and public servants. James Marape is Peter O'Neill with another name and face whether we like it or not. Democracy has not really worked for us in the last 44 years. Those that frame our national policies are some of the most corrupt themselves. Communism may be an alternative to solving the corruption problem in our politics and public service. Death by firing squad or life sentence to any corrupt leader in politics or the public service will pave the way for us to become a better country. Like cancer, corruption must be surgically cut out and removed. Corruption must die for us to become what we envision. Communism may be an alternative to solving the persistent corruption problem in our politics and public service. And maybe, just maybe we can achieve this foolish pipe dream our politicians have thrown at us.

I agree with you Soniah, that is a brilliant idea proposed

Thanks Ian for this view on the importance of DHS of a country. The importance of DHS becomes valuable if the government and its institutions are able and willing to use the data to guide their country’s development policy and program. Without considering the importance of such country’s information, what has been provided by DHS become no use to the country and it is for mere citing in official documents and for academic purpose. For example, in PNG data provided by NSO were never taken on board as critical information in policy and program formulation by the government and the institutions. The data were merely cited as information for public speeches and for launching projects by politicians to reach general audiences. The politicians themselves do not understand the DHS information. The efforts and resources contributed to produce the DHS becomes waste in the end.

Thanks Stephen and Sherman for this analytical work on DFAT’s AIPs. As an Aid worker in DFAT’s bilateral programs in PNG, I have few comments to offer. AIPs is one of the Aid delivery framework for Australian aid across the globe. However, AIPs is not the only blueprint for successful aid delivery in the recipient nations, there are other factors that also contribute to a success or a failure of an Australian Aid AIPs. In most cases, AIPs provide an obscured framework in the background and not in the front guiding aid delivery. Why AIP? AIPs reflect Australia and DFAT aid delivery framework, but the recipient nation’s development framework is another thing that, in most cases may not be complimented with AIPs. This would affect AIPS program delivery in the recipient nations. Another situation in the recipient nations that may affect AIPs delivery is the political economy trend of the recipient nation. Depending on the recipient nation’s political economy, AIPs could demand more resources than Australia willing to provide in aid. For example, in your two graphs above; PNG last had an AIP in 2018 (graph 1) and PNG AIP performance level (graph 2) was low at 27 %. This could not only due to the absence of an AIP but could be due to the local political economy situation of the country as well.

Thank you Raphael Yanka for the issue written. It's a good piece of writing. Looking at the issue and some of the strategic measures used to solving it, especially in the Nations Capital - Port Moresby.They all fell short or there were loopholes. The way I see it, the policies introduced to addressing the issue concentrated only on NCD which is the main market where demand is high and money supply in population per capita is high. Thus ,betel-nut becomes an inelastic good. However, the strategic policies have not touched the suppliers or growers. The NCD through the NEC might be able to push through to have betel- nut producing provinces to; - strategically design marketing of betel-nut by controlling supply. - Bringing awareness to the producers on the negative effects of betel-nut in NCD. (Quick income I know will be a motivation to disobeying,but will eventually sink in) - Awareness on marketing other cash crops that has health benefits other then betel-nut. Strengthen market for those cash crops. Have experts teach techniques in producing those cash crops in good supply to meet market demand. There might be more to what's mentioned above. But, the basic idea is, if the policies to addressing the issue in NCD didn't workout. Try another stakeholder and that is the growers or producers.

I want to know more about the informal Economy law

Great piece guys!